Am 18.08.2012 20:14, schrieb
djandus:
Whenever I first learned {soi}, I had a similar thought, but slightly different. It's not to take SOI and make it JOI, because that's basically completely undesired. Instead, it would say: What do you mean? ku can always be elided, even with JOI: lo mlatu joi lo gerku There was a time when this didn't work due to parser limitations, but we're long past that.
A similar thing happens in my proposal too, but this is a bit weird, because you're filling one sumti place while leaving all the others empy.
mi bevri lo tanxe ti fa'u tu ze'a lo cacra be li bi ca lo cabdei [...] soi sees extremely little usage; almost any change is an improvement, but moving soi to JOI is a bit odd, it still feels hackish. My suggestion doesn't break usage though, if that's really of importance. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. |