[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Dscript + Lojban ???
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 September 2012 18:44, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We only have words to support hex and lower. You're welcome to do
>>> anything you'd like, but the official writing system shall remain Roman.
>>
>> Strictly speaking, there is no official writing system. Any writing system
>> that can unambiguously refer to each of lojban's sounds is valid, but none
>> is official. The Roman writing system, albeit the most widespread and de
>> facto official script, is not *technically* official.
>>
>> Sorry to pick nits here, but I don't like seeing anyone being mislead,
>> even those who are unlikely to even really learn much lojban.
>
> Um, you happen to be wrong on this one. The Lojban orthography which uses
> the Roman script /is/ the official one, both "technically" and in reality.
> It is not merely the "de facto" one.
As per this: http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg26595.html,
back on Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:54:33 there was no official
alphabet/orthography and both Robin and Jorge weren't inclined to
approve one. Have this changed? Is there now an officially approved
one?
mu'o mi'e betsemes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.