Re: [lojban] voi

[la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:44:42 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:

If it's being used to restrict a referent set based on a subjective/uncertain claim, then it's certainly alright.

However, voi can probably be substituted with {poi pe'i} or {poi ju'oru'e}. Still, it's shorter.

Bring him to the la selpa'i 's side doi la tsani ;)

 

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 22 September 2012 07:54, Pierre Abbat <ph...@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

Is this an appropriate use of voi?: "ta voi citka lo bambusa cu cionmau",
pointing at a baby panda. Baby pandas don't eat bamboo; they drink milk like
any other mammal.

Pierre
--
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/6WDxF8bqMqsJ.
 
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.