Re: [lojban] ije + naku ?

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason *not* to so modify the parser?  I'm really
> surprised this restriction exints; does anyone know the reason?

If you want a prenex to have scope over ijek-connected sentences, you
can't allow each sentences to have its own prenex (or at least the
first one can't have its own prenex). I always found the choice of
giving ijeks tighter scope than prenexes unintuitive, but whichever
way you choose, you lose something. With forethought connectives, the
issue doesn't arise.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.