Re: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of UI6 as imperativity

[guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>]

2012/11/17 la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>:
> There was a thread on {xa'e} sev. months ago (actually I started it) with
> someone replying that {.e'i} is the solution.
>

I don't think {.e'i} implies {.e'a}. I need a broader term than the
attitudinals {au}, {a'o}, {e'o}, {e'u}, {e'a} and {ei}.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.