Every Lojbanist understands that gismu denote predicates that are highly practical.e.g. {pilno} includes a goal as pilno3. Indeed, how can we imagine using something without a goal?My question is who collected those definitions? Was it JCB? How was this gimste formed? Is there a changelog of modifications to gismu definitions starting from the first edition of loglan?
My particular interest here is with the recent discussion of a possible new gismu meaning "qua". The corresponding word is of high frequency in Mandarin but in European languages it is often confused with words meaning {simsa}.e.g."as" means both "like" and "qua".Russian "как" [kak] means both "like" and "qua".Were Mandarin predicates taken into consideration while constructing gismu definitions?--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/es2OIcUu0OkJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.