Re: [lojban] darno/jibni

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

It really doesn't matter. As .lojbab. recently said on a different thread, the abstractions in () are just there to indicate that that place should have an abstraction, and whatever is in () is the kind(s) that are usually used.

It's not restrictive.

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com> wrote:

http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/jibni
jibni: x1 is near/close to/approximates x2 in property/quantity x3 (ka/ni).

http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/darno
darno: x1 is far/distant from x2 in property x3 (ka).

Shouldn't darno's definition be "x1 is far/distant from x2 in
property/quantity x3 (ka/ni)"?
Or maybe jibni's definition be "x1 is near/close to/approximates x2 in
property x3 (ka)?

Why the difference?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.