coi lo mriste
This is just a short question and I don't want to discuss
the whole topic right now, because we'll probably
have that discussion in 1-2 month with some more detailed
texts/research to talk about. I will write a term paper
on that topic.
The question is: Is there or isn't there a direct ba'e historical
connection between Keith Donnellan's paper "Reference and Definite
Descriptions" and the current usage of {le} and {lo}?
mi'e la .van. mu'o
Attachment:
pgp5GRDO_U4M5.pgp
Description: PGP signature