[lojban] Re: Noun-ness of {vindu}

[Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>]

Noticed something wrong.

On 21 March 2013 09:17, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:

Also, are toxins intrinsically related to their effects? Can we say that something is a toxin if it *does nothing*? I'd also suggest throwing in an x3, a property of the x2, which is the effect of the toxin. The structure of this new vindu is thus parallel to {xajmi}.

It doesn't parallel {xajmi}. xajmi3 is a property of xajmi1, not xajmi2, whereas vindu3 would be a property of vindu2, not vindu1.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.