[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] A Discussion of the Lojban System of Place Structure



On 27 March 2013 16:52, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
 <snip>
mi zmadu do lo ni barda (I exceed you in property of being big) => mi poi zilkarbi do cu barda (I compared to you is big).

ka, not ni. ni is quantity, ka is property.


Although this is completely unrelated to the thread -- then again so is your reply, too -- the abstraction suggestions in the gimste are not prescriptive. (You can dig around the archives to see that Lojbab himself has said this.) 

Some of us have adopted a system of abstractions that is more self-consistent, and indeed, that system puts a quantity abstractor in zmadu3. What gleki said isn't wrong; it simply doesn't conform to your style of Lojban.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.