Re: [lojban] A Discussion of the Lojban System of Place Structure

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

The proof of the point, of course.  But it still does not show in either case that there might be a complete set of unambiguous places/cases.

---

From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] A Discussion of the Lojban System of Place Structure

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:59:54AM -0700, John E Clifford wrote:
> From: MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>
>
> > Yes, places can, because each place of each selbri can be defined uniquely. 
>
> And so can each preposition/case.
>

Sure, but it probably doesn't make sense to define a preposition for klama1,
one for klama2, one for citka2, one for gerku2 and all the other places out there.

If places do not group well together, it simply doesn't make sense to have
propositions for them - although you can do that if you like. Lojban even
"kind of" supports you with {fi'o}.


v4hn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.