[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: The Mad Proposals



On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:21:03 PM UTC+4, remod wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:01 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:

Although one is always free to add http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/gije and it's friends to jbovlaste.

 
In this case it would be different as they would probably interfere with the formal grammar. The language must remain unambigously parseable  or every will be lost!

The best would be if the changes would be compatible so that whatever was grammatically correct before introducing GIJA will stay correct.

if GIhA is retained for backward compatibility then nothing previously written is broken. But only for GIJA/GIhA. Other proposals break some things.

btw, cmavo definitions have been initially broken in jbovlaste. A complaint that i got just today is that

{.ai} means "intent" but defined in jvs as the full scale "attitudinal: intent - indecision - rejection/refusal." which has to be in comments, not in the definition.



remod

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.