(Resending; it didn't come back the first time.)
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 21:37:42 Jacob Errington wrote:
> The title says it all; the following won't parse:
>
> {.i broda .ija'ebo brode .iseri'abobo brodi}
>
> It just seems like multiple {bo} is illegal across the board. Bug orThere's only one level of precedence with "bo". If you want more, use "ke".
> feature? Could this even be implemented? If it can, should we?
".i broda .ija'eke brode .iseri'abo brodi" parses, but "ke" is implicitly
terminated just after "brode". I suggest ".ikeja'e", which currently doesn't
parse.