[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] A Question about GIJA



On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
If we decide to refactor the connective system, could {gi mu'i} be made to mean the same thing as the clunky {gi'e mu'i bo} (which under GIJA would be {gi je mu'i bo} ?


No, because one of "ge (broda gi-mu'i brode) gi (mu'i brodi)" and "ge (broda) gi (mu'i brode gi-mu'i brodi)" would be inaccessible.  
 
I can see this breaking the case where {broda gi'e mu'i brode}. However, maybe if we throw in a {bo}, everything becomes okay? e.g. {.i broda gimu'ibo brode}. I think this works, and doesn't break anything.

Thoughts?

 I think that one should work.  

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.