[lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla

[Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com>]

coi rodo
While reading the other thread on commands, I noticed this sentence by la gleki:

"e'i si ei si xoi si sei bilga mi bazu troci lo ka stika lo tatoebas jufra"

"lo tatoebas jufra" is ungrammatical according to standard lojban, but
I have been seeing around that de facto may be different from the
standard. I now think that standard lojban naming rules are broken,
and using cmevla as brivla is the way to go, at least on the field of
naming. I found this old conversation:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/lojban/rSXFTFeMA_o
in which Robin said the rules weren't broken. I now strongly disagree.

So my question is what's de facto on this subject?

mu'o mi'e betsemes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.