Re: [lojban] A bug in the CLL 7.6 example 6.14).

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:21 AM, la arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, June 17, 2013 2:04:19 AM UTC+4, Latro wrote:

Useful examples of {nei} are somewhat hard to produce. As selbri or even seltau it is essentially useless, because the result is recursive; this is the case for 6.14. Even as sumti it's not that common, in my experience, to need {lo SE nei} and be unable to use both {vo'V} and {ri}, since this means you need nesting and a nested bridi with > 2 sumti in it.

vo'V is long scope

in {mi djuno lodu'u do lumci vo'a} vo'a refers to {mi} and  {ri} wouldnt work at all.

My negation scope was ambiguous; it was intended to be a {na'ei} negation with {.e} joined sumti, so that it's better phrased as "able to use neither ... nor ..."

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.