[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Individuals and xorlo
la .guskant. cu cusku di'e
Moreover, calling something in a domain of plural variable "one or more
individuals" is misleading for me.
The term for "something in a domain of plural variable" should be first
given; after that "individual" is defined using it. The concept
"individual" is only a special case of "something in a domain of plural
variable" as defined above.
What would be another case of SDPV that is not an individual? I can't
really make sense of your argument, because for me there are only
individuals and nothing else (DPV or not).
Something that is broda is not always "one or more individuals" defined
above: when a universe of discourse is given, there is no need that {lo
broda} in the universe of discourse is finally separated into individual
pieces that are members of the universe of discourse.
Please give an example where that does not happen.
mi'e la selpa'i mu'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.