[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] "three times as big"

Distributivity is not a problem in the original question. Distributivity there (with {ro}) is good.


On 17 February 2014 13:47, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
  How about "lo marce cu selca'u [pa'a/tai/lo canlu be] paki'o smacu"?


The problem with distributivity here is simply fixed with a {lo} before {pa ki'o}, but then we would be introducing a thousand rats in the discourse, whereas, in principle, there could be only one.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.