Am Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:08:36 -0300
schrieb Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
Wow. If this is true, then things are seriously messed up in Lojban. The
> The issues with cmevla and fu'ivla have to do with which syllables are
> considered acceptable in Lojban words. CLL is not completely clear on
> that, and that's why different parsers went with different things.
morphology is a core part of the language. And that part is not well
defined? I never really noticed that but I fear this is actually true.
Seriously, this sucks. I think a revision of the CLL is badly
needed.
If there is no formalization, parsers are doomed to give different
or nonsensical results. If parsers are doomed to give such
results, the issues for jbovlaste can not be fixed. But then this means
the bug does neither lie in jbovlaste, nor in vlatai nor in camxes. The
bug appears to be actually in Lojban itself. Seriously, I hate to type
this, but: This is messed up. :-(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.