la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e
Before you call this another claim without evidence, here is a thread from 2010 about just that: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lojban/xn8hCt3AagwI don't see anything under that topic even slightly relevant to the current discussion. It seems to be about whether people use the machine grammar in their heads when speaking Lojban. Though indeed most of the claims in said discussion were indeed without evidence.
Please, did you even read the thread? It's about Robin's essay which clearly states that he doesn't want usage to decide and that he wants a centralized, formalized language. The responses in the thread (in which you *did* participate) showed that pretty much everyone except you agreed with him. The situation hasn't changed since then, but feel free to ignore it further. You clearly have no interest in acknowledging other people's ideals concerning the specification of Lojban even when they outnumber you and include many of the most prominent Lojbanists of all time, for which *I* have more respect than anything else.
mi'e la selpa'i mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.