[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] One end cmavo to rule them all



If you want to think seriously about this topic, may I suggest you read http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=Magic_Words_Alternatives and the other magic words link I sent you. How to deal with these sorts of words is a hard problem in Lojban, with lots of corner cases. These documents contain some of the best thinking around.

To answer your specific question, having the magic word on the left does make things easier. After binding it would be considered a single word of the desired selma'o. Eg lo barda xaulo si bloti = lo barda bloti.

-- Ross


On 10 August 2014 03:07, TR NS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 8, 2014 1:09:50 PM UTC-4, Latro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:00 AM, TR NS <tran...@gmail.com> wrote:

Also, thinking about the use case you describe, it occurs to me that it would be much easier to remember a single cmavo that worked in conjunction with the opening cmavo, e.g. `ke melbri nixli kexo ckule` instead of `ke melbri nixli ke'e ckule` where `xo` is some cmavo that means "close the cmavo I just mentioned".
"Selma'o cast" type cmavo, which is really what you are suggesting (it casts LE to KU, NOI to KUhO, etc.) are generally difficult to formalize. This is a big part of why mekso is such a big mess. (Another is just YACC parser limitations, some of which have not been corrected in the semi-official PEG or even the zasni gerna).

Going into some details, let's call your cmavo {xau} for discussion ({xo} is taken). {vau} and arguably {boi} do not match your paradigm. {le'u} looks like it should, but it really doesn't, because if {lo'u xau} terminates {lo'u} then you can't quote {lo'u xau} to explain what it means. (By contrast, you can quote {le'u} using {zo} and can quote {zo} using {lo'u}/{le'u}, which means there is syntax available for defining these in Lojban.) The interaction with {lu} would be intelligible but counterintuitive and possibly not formalizable: {lu ... lu xau} appears to start a second quote and then, doesn't. And finally you would need to specify how exactly {xau} interacts with {si} (is {ke xau} one word or two?). Everything else would probably work out.


Good point about quotations. Just leaving quotes out of this seems better, so no {lo'u}, and even if strictly possible, not {le'u} or {lu} either. Your point about {lu} made we wonder though. What about {xau lu} versus {lu xau}? Would having {xau} go first make things more intelligible, and can that work grammatically? Not sure about {si} but I think probably one, b/c it is probably better to repeat the whole thing if need be.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.