[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] the future of Lojban's leadership



On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

If xorxes is correct then the refgram was not invalidated so much as made incomplete. 

CLL, despite its name, was never a complete description of the language, so xorlo could not have made it something it already was.
 
But I can't say, since I never really understood xorlo.

That may be true, but you never really understood CLL gadri either. Your understanding of gadri is actually closer to xorlo than to CLL. Look at the (pre-xorlo, pre-CLL) ma'oste definition of "lo": "veridical descriptor: the one(s) that really is(are) ..." That's basically xorlo, not CLL. There's no trace of a hidden quantifier there.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.