[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2



Some kinda  subfunction?

On Saturday, September 27, 2014 8:03:28 PM UTC-4, TR NS wrote:


On Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:59:15 PM UTC-4, Martin Bays wrote:

Yes. Here's a simpler example:

ro da poi verba cu prami lo mamta be da

FA x1:(verba(_)). mamta(f0(x1),x1)
FA x1:(verba(_)). prami(x1,f0(x1))

ro da poi ke'a verba ku'o zo'u li ma'o fyno mo'e da lo'o mamta da
.i ro da poi ke'a verba ku'o zo'u da prami li ma'o fyno mo'e da lo'o


Here, we interpret {lo mamta be da} as a function from children to their
mothers; the first proposition expresses this, and the second is then
the main statement.

Sorry if I am being daft, but what is `f0`? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.