[lojban] Re: {le} as an anaphorical particle

[TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>]

On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:25:19 AM UTC-4, la gleki wrote:

It is in no way a proposal but just a thought mildly based on former usage

http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=%27%27%27le%27%27%27_as_an_anaphorical_particle

For other proposals regarding {le} with full explanations add here: http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=le

If one mentions something that is not in any previous utterance, does "look up" fall back to context? And beyond that if there is no clear referent, then is the thing presupposed? To clarify, if I said out of the blue, "le xirma cu bajra", do you just presuppose some horse exists?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.