Re: [lojban] Re: CLL: I'd like to drop the formal grammars.

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

Oh, I hadn't thought of dropping only the YACC; that's a very
interesting idea.

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:38:38PM -0400, Alex Burka wrote:
> I don't have much of an opinion since I prefer the PEG and
> obviously that's not going in this edition, but surely Lojban is
> still confirmed as machine-parseable by the inclusion of one and
> not both grammars. And I don't mean to deny the usefulness of the
> YACC grammar to Bob, but I'll point out that the fact that it was
> pedagogically useful to _write_ doesn't necessarily imply that
> it's pedagogically useful for others to _read_ %^)
> 
> mu'o mi'e la durka 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Spacenut wrote:
> 
> > As a layperson, not knowing anything about the formal grammar, I say we absolutely should keep it in there. Though it may be of no use to me, The Complete Lojban Language is not complete without the full grammar. Also, as a less technical and more psychological argument, it reinforces the idea that Lojban is 100% syntactically unambiguous to people who don't know anything about the parser. The fact that it can be interpreted (don't know if that's the right word there) by a computer is one of the reasons why I'm learning Lojban, and having tangible evidence of that is pretty powerful.
> > 
> > On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:59:12 AM UTC-4, Robin Powell wrote:
> > > 
> > > In the age of ubiquitous internet, I feel that the entire Formal 
> > > Grammars chapter simply doesn't belong in a printed book. 
> > > 
> > > Does anyone disagree? 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > http://intelligence.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. 
> > > .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i dafsku lu na go'i li'u .e 
> > > lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e 
> > > lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/KpcylrlDNX0/unsubscribe.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com).
> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com (mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com).
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
http://intelligence.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i dafsku lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.