[lojban] Logical scope of LAhE

[Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>]

coi ro do

I have a question.
Let's consider the sentence {mi djica tu'a da}. Does {da} have 
scope/priority over {tu'a}, or vice versa?
Which of the below expansions is correct?

1) {mi djica lo du'u su'o da zo'u da co'e} -- {tu'a} expands first, it 
has priority over {da}.
2) {su'o da zo'u mi djica lo du'u da co'e} -- {da} expands first, it has 
priority over {tu'a}.
3) Ambiguous scope.

The Lojban interpreter Tersmus opines that {da} has priority over 
{tu'a}. However, this behavior doesn't parallel the way LE is handled:

{mi djica lo co'e be da} is interpreted as {mi djica lo poi'i su'o da 
zo'u ke'a da co'e}, and not as {su'o da zo'u mi djica lo poi'i ke'a da 
co'e}, so {lo} has scope/priority over {da}.

Shouldn't all the gadri (LE and LAhE, in this case) have the same 
behavior with regard to logical scope?

mu'o mi'e la .ilmen.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.