Re: [lojban] Re: Questions about Lojban

[Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

2015-01-28 15:49 GMT+03:00 Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:

As for the Lojban sentence proposed by Gleki, {mi puku viska lo vinji ca lo nu lo se xi vei pa .a re no'a cu vofli ga'u la .tsurix.}, it can be simplified to {mi puku viska lo vinji ca lo nu ri .a mi vofli ga'u la .tsurix.}, which is similar to what I suggested but having «me and/or the aircraft» as the flying thing; this is also structurally unambiguous, and very explicitly not saying what exactly is flying (me, the aircraft or both?).

Of course, to say even shorter ambiguity is often just OR or XOR logical operators implied by the tree so I have no idea what is meant by monoparsing compared to English. What are the examples? Is it a resitrction of Lojban grammar or vice versa a flexibility?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.