I've been compiling both locally on OSX (ex:
alexburka.com/tmp/cll_5.pdf) and with my git-auto-updating-gizmo on a Debian server (ex:
alexburka.com/lojban/cll_5.pdf) and getting wildly different fonts. Specifically, with the font I get on Linux I'm having to split a lot of examples to prevent them overflowing the page. So which font (or neither) is the one you will use when building the real PDF?
- mu'o mi'e la durkavore
El viernes, 23 de enero de 2015, 17:07:00 (UTC-5), Robin Powell escribió:
Right now I'm working on table alignment and making sure the tables
aren't too wide, which is easy stuff anybody able to handle github
can help with.
I'm on the docbook-prince branch; see for example
https://github.com/lojban/cll/commit/1f13384d3ef48158011c6837e47202930a606abe
The <interlinear-gloss> tables, of which there are many, are now
strictly aligned by word, where "word" is defined as "not spaces".
So in the old version we might have had:
mi cu klama
I go
In the new version this would result in:
mi cu klama
I go
So I've been inserting - when there's no equivalent word, like so:
mi cu klama
I - go
The other big one has been glossing "la" as "that-named".
Anyways, there's *LOTS* of this sort of work to do; I could use some
help.
THESE ARE CONTENT CHANGES PLEASE BE VERY CAREFUL.
Send pull requests. Thanks!
--
http://intelligence.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i dafsku lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u