— What is the semantic difference between {selja'e}, {rinka} and {bapli}? Does {selja'e} express a weaker relation than that expressed by {rinka}? — The notes of {rinka} say it is a material condition; however, a true logical material condition (ganai...gi...) does not express any causal/physical relationship (if I'm not mistaken), which seems to contradict the main definition of {rinka}. So, does {rinka} entails a causal relationship? — Is {danre} the right word for the physics notion of "force"? If so, what {bapli} is all about? — Which of the three below meanings should {banzu} have? (All of the below meanings are used in actual usage, making {banzu} a polysemous predicate.) 1) That x1 happens is a sufficient condition for x2 to happen. 2) The amount x1 (ni) is great enough for x2 to happen. 3) The amount of x1 having property x2 is great enough for x3 to happen. #1 parallels {sarcu} and seems redundant to {rinka}; #2 is the same thing as {banzuni}; #3 parallels the meaning/usage for {dukse}, and sometimes {banzuka} is used for this meaning. Any thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Ilmen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |