Re: [lojban] Re: Proposal: loi lerfu tcita detri; the final word on the problem of dates and times?

[Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>]

On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:57:19 Alex Burka wrote:
> Yes, I agree (for newtons we currently have *{niutni} [which needs to be
> fixed morphologically, maybe to {klanrniiutni} or {cniiutni}] and
> {ki'orgratretrefrinynidysnidu}, and for joules we have the more reasonable
> {djaule}). But if we're thinking about a system then it's good to know how
> to write things out.

{ni'utni} is valid. It has the same pattern as {ma'agni} (which is a tree, not 
a unit).

Pierre
-- 
The gostak pelled at the fostin lutt for darfs for her martle plave.
The darfs had smibbed, the lutt was thale, and the pilter had nothing snave.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.