[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Proposal for new cmavo: {vau'u}


On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Spheniscine <spheniscine@gmail.com> wrote:

Perhaps we could make {vau'u} the famyma'o of the unit of a sentence (though in attempting to make sense of the parser output, my second bridi-less sentence doesn't seem to produce a structure called "sentence"; is there no structure that describes the construct between two {.i}, or between the start of the text / NIhO and the first {.i}?).

The constructs separated by ".i" are either "statement" or "fragment". The latter I believe is on its way out though. It gets a little more complicated with ".i je" and ".i [je] tag bo".
 
Or if it's too difficult to come up with a solution now, we could treat VAUhU like I as a temporary "hack" solution.

An indicator attached to ".i" normally applies to the following sentence, and one attached to "vau'u" of selma'o I might as well apply to the preceding one. Or you could make "vau'u" an elidable terminator for "statement". 

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.