> > "," is ce'o bu. What happened to slaka bu?
> >
>
> I remember changing to {ce'o bu} so that this part of ASCII table got
> at least some structure. Otherwise ()*+,-./ loses its reference to
> mathematics. Of course, this poses a question should full stop be
> {denpa bu}. Maybe {mu'o bu}. Definitely we can use letteralize {.i}
> (sentence separator).
> Also full stop/comma are used as decimal separator and for groups of
> digits like in "1,002.56" although this is not culturally neutral and
> can cause confusion. Is there an ISO-standard for that? other than
> that {ki'o bu} and {pi bu} could be used making
> ()
> +-*/
> .,
> sets somewhat organized.
Please don't hijack standard bu-letterals. :-(
I've already had to fix the letterals for ', w, q and h earlier because
they had non-standard translations.
“slaka bu” is very standard; we should not invent new bu-letterals if
out of thin air if there already is a standard one, it just
increases confusion otherwise. Having a 100% parallel set is of low
priority.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.