I much prefer a UI marker for [non-]restrictiveness. That unifies a lot of stuff, providing a way to think about {ne} in terms of {pe}, {noi} in terms of {poi}, etc and reduces cmavo proliferation (refer to the Cmavo Non-Proliferation Act of 2014, zo'o). And {ta'o} seems to fit.
mu'o mi'e la durkavore
On August 2, 2015 at 3:34:49 AM, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) (spheniscine@gmail.com) wrote:
About Pxoi vs Nxoi:
We *could* make say {ni'oi} Nxoi, while xoi = Pxoi (either
that or assign {pi'oi}, but I'm reluctant to use that cmavo space
if we aren't gonna kill {xoi}, which might be impossible to do at
this point).
On the other hand though, there might be a need for a UI to
mark "non-restrictive" information, since {xoi} is proposed to be
an expansion for {fi'o}, BAI, and sumtcita anyway. Thus this UI can
then be useful to mark any sumtcita place (or even, say, seltau) as
incidental information.
I *think* {ta'o} works for that purpose, but others might
disagree. There's also {ra'unai}, but I'm not sure if it's
suitable, and I'd prefer an unnegated form because I believe that
information should be considered restrictive by default.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/ylLq6Urt3N4/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
|