[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause



On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com> wrote:

NON-SUBORDINATING/INDEPENDENT TAGS:
• {mi sipna ri'a lo nu tatpi} entails {mi sipna}.
• {mi sipna ri'a nai lo nu tatpi} entails {mi sipna}.
• {mi citka se pi'o lo forca} entails {mi citka}.
• {snime carvi ca nai lo nu critu} entails {snime carvi}.

I'm not sure I agree with this part. I admit they all appear to be strong pragmatic entailments, especially without context, but are they logical entailments? How would you translate, for example: "I (only) eat with a fork. There are no forks. Therefore, I do not eat."

mu'o mi'e xorxes
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.