Yes, it was once discussed and never got into the wiki. If you have time plase make an article so that se goi is in the title with possibly redirects from {se po} into it.--2016-04-09 13:52 GMT+03:00 Bruno Panasiewicz <ciuak.prog@gmail.com>:--coi ro doThe problem with «goi» is that it is ambiguous—one can not know which way the assignment goes.I was thinking about a nice solution, and found one. Basically, «goi» assigns the left sumti to the right one. If one wants to do it the other way around, he says «se goi». For example:Actually, this syntax can work with any other GOI! I will throw more examples at you:
- ko'a goi ko'e – it-1, from now on referred to as it-2;
- la .alis. se goi ti – Alice, which from now on refers to this thing here.
What do you think?
- lo vi ninmu se po lo junla – this woman here owning a watch («po»: owned by..., «se po»: owning...);
- lo vi nanmu se po'e lo panzi – this man here having a child («po'e»: intrinsic property of..., «se po'e»: owning intrinsically...).
mi'e la .uakci mu'ozo «crocatra» zo'o
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.