[lojban] -bom-/-nom- & KE

[Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>]

> it should be a rafsi of a cmavo of KE!

But NU and KEI behave the same way as rafsi. Now, they could work as KE/KEhE, but it does not seem necessary to me.

> Here's the question: would it be useful to have a KE that works like -bom-/-nom- - turns the enclosed selbrisle into a selbrisle, the meaning of which is the thing named by those selbrisle?

I would imagine so. It would not hurt, anyway.  It also seems natural, especially if these rafsi were to exist. It kind of weirds me out to have rafsi which exist in no other form (meaning that no truly complete veljvo may be formed). I would just ask that the cmavo selrafsi be fo la .lojban. are similar to these rafsi (meaning that they begin with a "b" or "n" respectively, and that they contain an "o" in them; I would also like them to look somewhat mutually similar).

___

> whatever the kurtV gismu is

What /is/ it? I have always said "kurti" in my head, but I am dying to know what others use. ;)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.