That is or isn't the point, depending on the intentions of the proposers. I think that the main motive is to free up a spot in the now expensive short cmavo space. Simply, the uses of «li» and «cu» have no overlaps, so collapsing them is a good idea.
— mi'e la uakci mu'o re'i
.i .e'e do co'a zukte su'o .y rimsaxsi'u —
On the question of making cu part of li I don't see how there meanings are anywhere close enough to Mic even if their place in a sentence are the same.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .