[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] A Simpler Connective System (blog article)



On 09/27/2016 01:57 PM, And Rosta wrote:


On 26 September 2016 at 16:58, Jacob Errington <jake@mail.jerrington.me
<mailto:jake@mail.jerrington.me>> wrote:


    {ko'a cu} is not a bridi-head, since a bridi-head can appear only
    before a bridi-tail. (I gave an informal characterization of
    bridi-heads and bridi-tails in my last message. Notice that my
    characterization rules out {ko'a cu} as a bridi-head, as it does not
    precede a bridi-tail.)


Can cu-terminated bridi-heads be conjoined, e.g. {ge ti cu gi ta cu
broda}? One would expect the answer to be Yes.

--And.


I wouldn't be against extending the connective system to allow it, but in the official grammar it is not possible to connect bridi-heads.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.