[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] A Simpler Quantifier Logic (blog article)

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org> wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2016 5:03:16 PM EDT Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:45 PM, selpahi <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 10.10.2016 02:08, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> >> And singular "no" is then "no pa", right?
> >
> > Yes, I would say so.
>
> I don't know if it's a good idea to use the same word for the digit "0" and
> the (plural) quantifier "~E".
>
> It could be confusing that "no pa no" is "no ten" rather than "010".

"no pa" is equal to "pa". Do you mean "no boi pa"?

No, I did mean "no'oi pa" which would become "no pa" if "no'oi" was replaced by "no".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.