[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban



doi la .pycyn.

You seem rather bitter about the current situation. Am I right?
What is your position about it? Could you imagine something to "fix" the situation?

Thanks.

la .sykyndyr.


Le lundi 6 novembre 2017 18:57:09 UTC+1, clifford a écrit :
"Lojban: the language where no one ever knows whether what he says is grammatical, and,if it is, whether it means what he intended." is apparently even more true now than it was nearly 30 years ago when it was first proposed. Even monoparsing, basically the only reason for Lojban's existence, is more in doubt now than it was even back in the early days of CLL (well, getting the right parse, at least; getting a unique one is easy). All the Baroque excrescences on the simple system JCB tossed away 60+ years ago seem to have done the opposite of helping.  And clearly learning Lojban has not helped to make people more rational or logical or even sensible.

pycyn
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.