Mail Thread Index

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), (continued)
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), John Cowan
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), Logical Language Group
easy text revisions, fschulz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- easy text revisions, fschulz
response to one note by Frank Schulz - tanru place structures, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- response to one note by Frank Schulz - tanru place structures, Logical Language Group
Tech fix responses, david twery
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Tech fix responses, david twery
Carl Sandburg poems, david twery
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Carl Sandburg poems, david twery
Re: JimC on Frank's easy text, Colin Fine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: JimC on Frank's easy text, Colin Fine
Metaphor in conlangs, Rick Morneau
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Metaphor in conlangs, Rick Morneau
Re: Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, jimc
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, jimc
Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, Colin Fine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, Colin Fine
- Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, John Cowan
- Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, John Cowan
Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, jimc
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, jimc
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Chris Handley
- Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Chris Handley
tanru place structure, fschulz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- tanru place structure, fschulz
Re: lojbab doesn't like fi'o, jimc
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: lojbab doesn't like fi'o, jimc
rafsi baseline and pe'a, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- rafsi baseline and pe'a, Logical Language Group
comments from Michael Helsem, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- comments from Michael Helsem, Logical Language Group
rafsi baseline, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- rafsi baseline, Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
[no subject], Logical Language Group
Re: TEXT.BEG easy text, Iain Alexander
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TEXT.BEG easy text, Iain Alexander
fi'o, fschulz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- fi'o, fschulz
BTW lujvo wanted, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- BTW lujvo wanted, Logical Language Group
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, Nick Nicholas
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, Nick Nicholas
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, Logical Language Group
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, John Cowan
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, John Cowan
- BTW lujvo wanted, Ivan A Derzhanski
- BTW lujvo wanted, Ivan A Derzhanski
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, John Cowan
- Re: BTW lujvo wanted, John Cowan
Re: Underwear (was: BTW lujvo wanted), Colin Fine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Underwear (was: BTW lujvo wanted), Colin Fine
responses to Frank Schulz and Jeff Prothero (delayed), Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- responses to Frank Schulz and Jeff Prothero (delayed), Logical Language Group
FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word, Logical Language Group
- Re: FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word, Colin Fine
- Re: FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word, Colin Fine
Re: lujvo-making algorithm, John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: lujvo-making algorithm, John Cowan
GENERAL: concerns of a new Lojbanist about Lojban List discussions, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- GENERAL: concerns of a new Lojbanist about Lojban List discussions, Logical Language Group
Re: observatives (was JimC on Colin on ....... ad nauseam), Colin Fine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: observatives (was JimC on Colin on ....... ad nauseam), Colin Fine
- Re: observatives (was JimC on Colin on ....... ad nauseam), John Cowan
- Re: observatives (was JimC on Colin on ....... ad nauseam), John Cowan
beginner exercise, fschulz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- beginner exercise, fschulz
- Re: beginner exercise, Logical Language Group
- Re: beginner exercise, Logical Language Group
'Observative' - terminology, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- 'Observative' - terminology, Logical Language Group
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, Colin Fine
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, Colin Fine
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, jimc
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, jimc
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, Iain Alexander
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, Iain Alexander
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, VILVA
- Re: 'Observative' - terminology, VILVA
impermissibles in names, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- impermissibles in names, Logical Language Group
[no subject], Rob Frantz
[no subject], Rob Frantz

Mail converted by MHonArc