Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: A nice mistake in the cmavo list., (continued)
  • Re: A nice mistake in the cmavo list., John Cowan
• TECH: attitudinal contours, John Cowan
• Problem with the list server?, Phillip Wayne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Problem with the list server?, Logical Language Group
• a usage problem, and a solution???, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a usage problem, and a solution???, Nick Nicholas
• Re: a usage problem, and a solution, jimc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • a usage problem, and a solution, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: a usage problem, and a solution, Colin Fine
  • Re: a usage problem, and a solution, Logical Language Group
  • Re: a usage problem, and a solution, jimc
• Is PLS awake?, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Is PLS awake?, Colin Fine
• Re: Ser Hombre, Iain Alexander
• Re: TECH: nec (Was: QUERY: quantifier scope & cumk, Colin Fine
• GEN.ADMIN: Re Reply-To who? (Was: Monthly posting for August, 1993), Iain Alexander
• TECH: Desperately seeking properties, Iain Alexander
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: Desperately seeking properties, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Desperately seeking properties, Iain Alexander
  • Re: TECH: Desperately seeking properties, John Cowan
• GENERAL/ADMIN Important: Lojbab's address to change soon, Logical Language Group
• Update on the youngest Lojbanists, Logical Language Group
• [no subject], Phillip Wayne
• Wordnet, Logical Language Group
• [no subject], u7911005
• Parser, Matthew Faupel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Parser, Matthew Faupel
  • Re: Parser, Logical Language Group
• [no subject], u7911005
• Chinese Lojbanists, and dollar checks, Logical Language Group
• Re: Quine (Was TECH: QUERY: quantifier scope & cumki), Colin Fine
• GEN: How Nick is faring, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GEN: How Nick is faring, Colin Fine
  • Re: GEN: How Nick is faring, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: GEN: How Nick is faring, Logical Language Group
  • Re: GEN: How Nick is faring, John Cowan
  • Re: GEN: How Nick is faring, Colin Fine
  • Re: GEN: How Nick is faring, Nick Nicholas
• Re: TECH: Desperately seeking [properties], Iain Alexander
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: Desperately seeking [properties], John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: Desperately seeking [properties], Iain Alexander
  • Re: TECH: Desperately seeking [properties], Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: Nec (Was: QUERY: quantifier scope & cumki), Iain Alexander
• lojban and MediaMOO; repost for salsbery@mailbox.syr.edu, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • lojban and MediaMOO; repost for salsbery@mailbox.syr.edu, Matthew Faupel
• The lurkers are appearing, Logical Language Group
• Hodges minilesson, Logical Language Group
• GENERAL: Announcement - new editions of Lojban printed materials avail, Logical Language Group
• [no subject], Logical Language Group
• [no subject], Logical Language Group
• lojban and MediaMOO, Kelly J. Salsbery
• MediaMOO and cmene, Mark E. Shoulson
• TEXT: martin.luter.kin., Nick Nicholas
• TECH: a few proposals anent attitudinals, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: a few proposals anent attitudinals, Nick Nicholas
• TECH: be'u/sea', John Cowan
• TECH: sisku, djica, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: sisku, djica, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: sisku, djica, Nick Nicholas
• ZAhO as sumti tcita, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ZAhO as sumti tcita, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: ZAhO as sumti tcita, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ZAhO as sumti tcita, Colin Fine
  • Re: ZAhO as sumti tcita, Jorge LLambias
• new attitudinals - the source, Logical Language Group
• anyone wanna make some lujvo???, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: anyone wanna make some lujvo???, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: anyone wanna make some lujvo???, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: anyone wanna make some lujvo???, Colin Fine
  • Re: anyone wanna make some lujvo???, Jorge LLambias
• possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, John Cowan
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Logical Language Group
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Logical Language Group
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Iain Alexander
• Believable Agents, Robert J. Chassell
• Re: TECH:, Robert J. Chassell
• PLS?, Phillip Wayne
• Concepts, Phillip Wayne
• Event contours and ZAhO tcita, VILVA
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, jimc
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Colin Fine
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, John Cowan
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, jimc
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Jorge LLambias
  • Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Art Protin
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: bi'u (Was: Desperately seeking [properties]), Colin Fine
• TECH: specifity & definiteness, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: specifity & definiteness, Logical Language Group