Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), (continued)
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Jorge Llambias
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Chris Handley
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Chris Handley
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Nick Nicholas
• Some questions about the text, Glyn Gowing
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Some questions about the text, Logical Language Group
• ADMIN: Charge cards, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ADMIN: Charge cards, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ADMIN: Charge cards, ucleaar
• ADMIN: New Lojban Parser Policy - Parser available on ftp, Logical Language Group
• LEXICON: Programming jargon, Logical Language Group
• TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, jimc
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
• ADMIN: Lojban parser available, FTP site reorganized, Logical Language Group
• (Forwarded) Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi, Veijo Vilva
• Possible problem with Lojban parser source, Logical Language Group
• Compiling the Lojban parser, Robert J. Chassell
• Converse of tu'a/ demonstratives, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Converse of tu'a/ demonstratives, Jorge Llambias
• Re: Animal gaits, ucleaar
• Re: "science" defined, Robert J. Chassell
• TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Logical Language Group
• TEXT: ze skami se finti lisri, Nick Nicholas
• TECH: Topic constructions and prenexes, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: Topic constructions and prenexes, Logical Language Group
• beginner questions: the lord's prayer, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: beginner questions: the lord's prayer, Logical Language Group
• beginner question: the lord's prayer, Chris Bogart
• TECH: lujvo : tutuear, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: lujvo : tutuear, Nick Nicholas
• response to And - old posting culture-specifcity, Logical Language Group
• TECH: panra/simsa, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: panra/simsa, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: TECH: panra/simsa, Colin Fine
• TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Jorge Llambias
• TECH: more on panra and only, Logical Language Group
• TECH: query re. jvajvo for "nu zei broda", ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: query re. jvajvo for "nu zei broda", Nick Nicholas
• Re: {cikre} as fat gismu, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: {cikre} as fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {cikre} as fat gismu, Logical Language Group
• Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Colin Fine
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Logical Language Group
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Logical Language Group
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
• Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Matthew Faupel
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, ucleaar
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Art Protin
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
• [no subject], lojban
• Long 5-parter coming, Logical Language Group
• [no subject], Logical Language Group
• [no subject], Logical Language Group
• Re: VSO languages? (was: Prefix languages?), Logical Language Group
• TECH: My semantics essay, Nick Nicholas
• sorry about unnumbered postings., Logical Language Group
• TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology, Logical Language Group