Mail Thread Index

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, (continued)
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi", Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi", Logical Language Group
- Re: Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi", Jorge Llambias
- Re: Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi", Jorge Llambias
  - Cowan withdraws magic "lo" proposal (was: Cowan's summary #2), Logical Language Group
  - Cowan withdraws magic "lo" proposal (was: Cowan's summary #2), Logical Language Group
Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Logical Language Group
- Re: Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Gerald Koenig
  - Re: Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Logical Language Group
  - Re: Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Logical Language Group
wff, lo broda...le broda, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- wff, lo broda...le broda, Logical Language Group
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Jorge Llambias
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Jorge Llambias
  - Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Logical Language Group
  - Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Logical Language Group
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Jorge Llambias
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Jorge Llambias
Outside quantifiers on masses, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Outside quantifiers on masses, Logical Language Group
- Re: Outside quantifiers on masses, Jorge Llambias
- Re: Outside quantifiers on masses, Jorge Llambias
  - Re: Outside quantifiers on masses, Logical Language Group
  - Re: Outside quantifiers on masses, Logical Language Group
"re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, i . alexander . bra0125
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, i . alexander . bra0125
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  - Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
"ro" doesn't imply +specific, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "ro" doesn't imply +specific, Logical Language Group
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, i . alexander . bra0125
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, i . alexander . bra0125
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, ucleaar
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, ucleaar
"le re loi tanxe", Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "le re loi tanxe", Logical Language Group
Re: two typical men, bob
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: two typical men, bob
negation translation, bob
- <Possible follow-ups>
- negation translation, bob
  - Re: negation translation, Logical Language Group
  - Re: negation translation, Logical Language Group
Re: re loi smani, bob
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: re loi smani, bob
  - Re: re loi smani, Logical Language Group
- Re: re loi smani, Logical Language Group
- Re: re loi smani, Jorge Llambias
- Re: re loi smani, Jorge Llambias
- Re: re loi smani, Goran Topic
- Re: re loi smani, Goran Topic
Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
  - Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Logical Language Group
  - Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Logical Language Group
- Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
- Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
- <Possible follow-ups>
- lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
- Re: lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
- Re: lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
Ralph believes someone is a spy, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Ralph believes someone is a spy, Logical Language Group
- Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy, bob
- Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy, bob
PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
- Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
- Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Chris Bogart
- Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Nick Legend Nicholas
- Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias

Mail converted by MHonArc