From kstein@xxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxxx Mon Jun 14 16:02:44 1999 X-Digest-Num: 167 Message-ID: <44114.167.1000.959273824@eGroups.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:02:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen Stein From: Robin Turner > > la tim. cusku di'e > > > I think Tim may have a point. While I agree with Pilch's stand, > I'm not sure that we should write a proposal as LLG. As it > happens, a lot of people in the Lojban community share similar > ideas on a variety of subjects, but we can't bundle these in with > Lojban, otherwise we could end up having a language with its own > built-in ideology ({zo'o} a bit like Esperanto). Perhaps the > best thing would be to set up something like "Lojban patents > working group" or whatever, rather than use LLG itself. > > co'o mi'e robin. > I think having a working group is an excelent idea. Further, since Pilch mentioned that whomever (ie. whichever group) made the proposal should be based in the EU, this makes even more sense. A working group can be based anywhere there is an active lojbaner. co'o mi'e karis.