From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Aug 23 13:42:04 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 23 Aug 2001 20:42:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 48655 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 20:39:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Aug 2001 20:39:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 20:39:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7NKdEJ19559 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:39:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:39:14 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Nick NICHOLAS wrote: > > Yes. I like this. I like this a lot. Breaks nothing, and brings in {si'o} > (which has barely been used at all) from the cold. > > Kudos, And! Count me in. Are we then agreeing that ka fasnu = si'o fasnu? ----- "It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950