Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:39:14 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Nick NICHOLAS wrote:

>
> Yes. I like this. I like this a lot. Breaks nothing, and brings in {si'o}
> (which has barely been used at all) from the cold.
>
> Kudos, And! Count me in.

Are we then agreeing that ka fasnu = si'o fasnu?

-----
"It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution
never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object
of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every
shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously
occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of
manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950