From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Aug 23 17:05:01 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 24 Aug 2001 00:05:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 56520 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 00:02:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2001 00:02:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 00:02:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7O027Y21186 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:02:06 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] soi vo'a: partial backflip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Nick NICHOLAS wrote: > > cu'u la xod. > >mi ba'e sanji le za'i da carmi nabmi .i ku'i ga'inai le do stidi > >mubycikre goi ko'a cu tolmelbi je juxre je cfipu .i .i'i .uu node > >frili cikre > > *looks astonished* Really? Then I think now I'm being the naturalist, and > you the hardliner! :-) And accused me of being an ultra-conservative not too long ago. I myself never swore allegance to either stance. I've only been pegged as a Naturalist by those who want Lojban as an XML application. ----- "It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950