From lojbab@lojban.org Thu Aug 23 23:48:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 24 Aug 2001 06:48:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 18499 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 06:48:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2001 06:48:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta1 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 06:48:16 -0000 Received: from user.lojban.org (dynamic77.cl7.cais.net [205.177.20.77]) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7O6mF926804 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010824024306.00d4d630@pop.cais.com> X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:45:52 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du' In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 10:48 PM 8/22/01 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >la pycyn cusku di'e > > >What exactly, please, is the problem and what is the argument about beyond > >this? > >Apparently the problem is that the list was too quiet lately and >we needed something to talk about. If I understood you correctly, >you approve of the way I use it, or at least you don't disapprove. Not only that but >I< approve of the way you use it. At least till the next time someone confuses me. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org