From eks2@york.ac.uk Fri Aug 24 01:41:57 2001
Return-Path: <eks2@york.ac.uk>
X-Sender: eks2@york.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 87981 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n29.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.184)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: eks2@york.ac.uk
Received: from [10.1.10.96] by b05.egroups.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2001 08:41:56 -0000
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:41:56 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: A parable
Message-ID: <9m540k+7iig@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <v03007800b7abbcde016a@[128.195.186.29]>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 397
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 144.32.128.133
From: "Evgueni Sklyanin" <eks2@york.ac.uk>

la nitcion. cusku di'e

> (1) "I am thinking," said Confucius, "that I am wise."
> .i mi pensi sei la konfucius.* cusku se'u ledu'u mi prije

I am confused. Shouldn't it be {jinvi} instead of {pensi}?

Just a month ago, someone was reprimanded in a similar context.

See
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/8944
and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/8946

co'o mi'e .evgenis.