From eks2@york.ac.uk Fri Aug 24 01:41:57 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: eks2@york.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 87981 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n29.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.184) by mta1 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 08:41:57 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: eks2@york.ac.uk Received: from [10.1.10.96] by b05.egroups.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2001 08:41:56 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:41:56 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: A parable Message-ID: <9m540k+7iig@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 397 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 144.32.128.133 From: "Evgueni Sklyanin" la nitcion. cusku di'e > (1) "I am thinking," said Confucius, "that I am wise." > .i mi pensi sei la konfucius.* cusku se'u ledu'u mi prije I am confused. Shouldn't it be {jinvi} instead of {pensi}? Just a month ago, someone was reprimanded in a similar context. See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/8944 and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/8946 co'o mi'e .evgenis.