From graywyvern@hotmail.com Fri Aug 24 11:33:51 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 24 Aug 2001 18:33:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 64385 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 18:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 Aug 2001 18:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.180) by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 18:32:12 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:32:12 -0700 Received: from 65.67.96.113 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:12 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.67.96.113] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: remoi malglico (was: A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2001 18:32:12.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[175A4660:01C12CCB] From: "michael helsem" >From: Invent Yourself li'o >In fact, a possible logical extension of this idea is that the baseline is >an unchangeable artifact, like any natlang grammar over the time span of >an education, and ponder what the hidden assumptions of it are. This is a >position of extreme conservatism, that could never discuss the idea of >resolving the contradiction of vo'a, for instance. vo'a would simply be >taken to refer to {either the self-bridi or the main-bridi}. Tough luck if >the reader finds it confusing. "Isn't it interesting", this viewpoint >would notice, "that while Lojban is so precise about everything else, >concerning this they are ambiguous!" > pe'iru'e tugni _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp